Keep Your Hands Off Seniors’ Pensions, Opposition Parties Tell Conservatives

• Conservative 2012 Pension Reduction Program 2019
• Conservative 2012 Pension Reduction Programs
• Conservative 2012 Pension Reduction Program 2018
• Conservative 2012 Pension Reduction Program Application

It has to be hypocrisy of the highest kind and an abuse of democracy that Conservatives with not even a year in power are abusing their majority government with a whole host of bonehead manoeuvres like abolishing the gun registry and trying to kill dissent on the Enbridge oil pipeline with the latest being trying to raise the age of seniors to 67 from 65 before they can collect Old Age Security (OAS) pension. Whatever the motives – Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s ill thinking can be summed up this way. He’s hoping that either the seniors will die before they qualify or shortly after, thereby cutting a huge take from the national treasury. Old Age pension is a right all Canadians have and it should not be tinkered with to make up for deficits created by Conservatives own bulging defence and crime budgets.

It’s true that the basic state pension rose by 75p per week in one year of the last Labour government (between 1999 and 2000). But the natural comparison isn’t with the total annual rise under seven years of Conservative-led government. In fact, pensions rose by more under Labour, on average, once you take inflation into account. Also among Harper’s first moves was cancellation of the $5-billion, five-year national child care program set up by the Liberals. It was replaced by a program that provides $100 a month to. September 28, 2012 – On September 12, Governor Jerry Brown signed into the law the Public Employee Pension Reform Act, which is the culmination of the pension reform plan he had been working on all year. The new law contains many sections that alter the way pensions across the state operate, but much of.

(Pullout #2 – middle )

“They [Conservatives] have no problem spending $30 billion on their F-35 boondoggle and another $19 billion for their unpopular prisons agenda, but they can’t spare $540 a month for Canada’s poorest seniors. It’s about time they get their priorities straight,” said NDP’s Pensions critic Wayne Marston.

By R. Paul Dhillon’ With News Files

OTTAWA— It has to be hypocrisy of the highest kind and an abuse of democracy that Conservatives with not even a year in power are abusing their majority government with a whole host of bonehead manoeuvres like abolishing the gun registry and trying to kill dissent on the Enbridge oil pipeline with the latest being trying to raise the age of seniors to 67 from 65 before they can collect Old Age Security (OAS) pension.

Whatever the motives – Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s ill thinking can be summed up this way. He’s hoping that either the seniors will die before they qualify or shortly after, thereby cutting a huge take from the national treasury.

Old Age pension is a right all Canadians have and it should not be tinkered with to make up for deficits created by Conservatives own bulging defence and crime budgets.

Many Canadians are on the side of the underdog seniors over the fat-cat Conservatives and their rightwing agenda.

Conservative 2012 Pension Reduction Program 2019

Bothe the opposition NDP and the Liberals are rightly stepping up their efforts to whip up public opposition to proposed changes by the Harper government to OAS.

The Liberals have launched an online petition where Canadians worried about the impact of OAS reforms can speak out. More than 12,000 signatures have been collected in less than a week, the party said Wednesday.

Conservative 2012 Pension Reduction Programs

“Our constituents are calling, emailing and visiting our constituency offices to tell us they want the Conservatives to take their hands off their pensions,” Liberal Leader Bob Rae said after his party’s caucus meeting, where Liberals were handing out newly minted red buttons saying “Hands Off Seniors’ Pensions.”

“During the last election Stephen Harper said he would not reduce transfer payments to provinces or individuals,” Rae said. “But now he’s threatening to take away tens of thousands of dollars of support from the seniors who need it most.”

Rae told reporters Harper’s expected changes to OAS reflect “neo-Conservative” policies and will penalize low-income retirees while downloading support costs for seniors on provincial and municipal governments.

Harper has said long-term reforms to the OAS are needed so Ottawa can keep it intact for future generations of retirees. But the Conservatives have not said how they plan to reduce costs for the program, which supplements the Canada Pension Plan for millions of modest income seniors.

Speculation has centered on a move that would eventually raise the eligibility requirement for OAS by two years, to age 67. Details are expected in the federal budget next month. But the Conservatives note that any changes would not affect those who are now retired or are about to retire.

The government should be focusing on eliminating poverty among seniors rather than using them to balance the federal budget, the NDP says.

The motion that will be debated in the Commons reads: “That this House rejects calls by the Prime Minister to balance the Conservative deficit on the backs of Canada’s seniors by means such as raising the age of eligibility for Old Age Security and calls on the government to make the reduction and eventual elimination of seniors’ poverty a cornerstone of the next budget.”

Conservative 2012 Pension Reduction Program 2018

Given the Conservative majority, the motion is unlikely to pass when it is voted on next week. But it will give the NDP a chance to draw more public attention to the pensions issue that has blown up into a major controversy since Harper first mentioned his plan to change OAS in a speech in Davos, Switzerland last week.

Pensions critic Wayne Marston (Hamilton East – Stoney Creek) added that budget cuts are all about choices – and Stephen Harper could easily choose wiser.

“The Conservatives gave $16 billion in tax cuts to profitable corporations without receiving a single job guarantee. And now, facing a revenue shortfall, they expect Canadian seniors to pay the price,” said Marston.

Conservative 2012 Pension Reduction Program Application

“They have no problem spending $30 billion on their F-35 boondoggle and another $19 billion for their unpopular prisons agenda, but they can’t spare $540 a month for Canada’s poorest seniors. It’s about time they get their priorities straight,” said Marston.

The Liberals said Friday that the Conservative government must consult with the provinces and territories before making any changes to Old Age Security.

The new European data protection law requires us to inform you of the following before you use our website:

We use cookies and other technologies to customize your experience, perform analytics and deliver personalized advertising on our sites, apps and newsletters and across the Internet based on your interests. By clicking “I agree” below, you consent to the use by us and our third-party partners of cookies and data gathered from your use of our platforms. See our Privacy Policy and Third Party Partners to learn more about the use of data and your rights. You also agree to our Terms of Service.